i have some more daily doodles to post, but first... when i posted/tweeted the "sangster" picture, i said it needed work, and someone asked why. which is an excellent and very important question. one of the fundamental jobs of any artist is to look at what they've done critically, and decide what worked and what could be improved.
in the case of the "sangster" picture, there wasn't anything wrong, it just isn't as strong as it could be. the main reason is that it's supposed to be a action-filled pose, but it has too many breaks in it.
pictured: boring
pictured: thicker lines! that must be important!
so a more fluid and energetic pose might look like this.
and that's that!
3 comments:
Wow, this is great stuff. Love your thought process, and your reworked compositions are terrific. Thanks so much for sharing, I love this post!
Nice evaluation :D Love to see other artists critique themselves visually, one does it so often in their head rather than on paper (or digitally). :)
Great study, buddy.
r.
Post a Comment